azajir.wordpress.com
The class action, handled by Susmabn Godfrey and WolfPopper LLP, made allegations against Mountainh View-based Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) of breachu of contract, unfair competition and false The case is pending in the Federao District Court of the Northern District of San Jose Division. Finapl approval of the settlement will be consideresdon Sept. 14. In April the lawsuit, filed by Kabatech Brown Kellner LLP, allegedf that Google was "deceivinyg its customers into paying for adsthey don't AdWords ads appear on Google.com as well as on Googlwe partner sites like Ask.com and may also appear on third-party Web sites which use the other side of the Google advertisinhg model.
Google charges its advertising customers when someone on one oftheir ads. Durinhg the sign-up process, users tell Googles the maximum that they are willingv to payper "During this process, users encounter two adjacent Into the first, customers enter the amounty they wish to pay per click of an ad displayerd on Google.com. The second box is marked Intothis box, a user can enter the amountt they would be willing to pay per clicik of an ad appearing on a third-party Web But leaving the box blank does not preventy ads from appearing on third-party sites," the law firm Google "places the ads on third-parth sites anyway.
And users are automatically charged per click based on the amount they entered into thefirstt box. This suit arises from the fact that both actionw occur without the user being thefirm added.
No comments:
Post a Comment